I still realize this is all a bunch of bunk until he comes back in a month or so, but I am solidly among the camp of people who believe that Randall Cobb should play at wide receiver in order to maximize Kentucky’s chances of winning this season.
First things first, a quarterback needs lots of capable receivers in order to optimize success in the SEC. If you look at the recent Kentucky bowl teams, one of the big trends was quality depth at WR. The 98-99 bowl teams of Tim Couch and Dusty Bonner had Craig Yeast, Jimmy Haley, Quentin McCord, Lance Mickelsen, Kevin Coleman, Jimmy Robinson, Derek Smith, Jermaine White and James Whalen.
Those teams also ran a smoke and mirrors gimmick offense, but they had the personnel to do it. The UK teams that won consecutive Music City Bowls had Keenan Burton, Jacob Tamme, Dicky Lyons, Steve Johnson and Rafael Little coming out of the backfield.
This year, Dicky Lyons has been extremely reliable. I’ve liked what I’ve seen from EJ Adams, Matt Roark and Gene McCaskill in limited roles. I think TC Drake and Maurice Grinter have been solid at tight end.
Still, with none of the running backs being as good at catching it out of the backfield as Little, this isn’t enough quality production at WR. I’ve been extremely disappointed with Kyrus Lanxter, to the point where I’m convinced he isn’t even close to healthy after his wrist injury.
I loved what I saw from Cobb against Louisville. He made some good catches and looked great in the open field.
With all of that in mind, why wouldn’t you play Cobb at WR? Isn’t it common sense for a team to somehow get its best players on the field as much as possible?
I think Mike Hartline is wise beyond his years at QB. I don’t have a problem with him starting under center. Wide receiver is clearly the weakest position on the offense, so why not strengthen that position by moving Cobb to the receiving corps?
Joker Phillips has had great success using the middle screen. Of the receivers on the depth chart, the only one I’m comfortable with running that play is Lyons. Cobb might do it even better.
Plus, it opens things up for some trick plays if Phillips wants to go with those. I’m not talking that crap that Ron Hudson pulled when he lined up Jared Lorenzen at WR and Shane Boyd threw a pick. I’m thinking about the play Pittsburgh used in the playoff game against Cincinnati with Antwaan Randle El and Hines Ward, both of whom played QB and college.
Putting Randall Cobb in at wide receiver gives the offense one more big play threat downfield than it would have with Cobb lining up at QB, and the only way for Kentucky to reach its potential this season, the best players need to be on the field as much as possible. Injuries happen. That’s just a part of the game. Cobb got injured when Tony Dixon got shoved into Cobb’s ankle and rolled it. Cobb was blocking downfield on that play, like receivers are supposed to do. It wasn’t a horrific coaching blunder. It was just one of those plays that happen every day. If the people who complained about Cobb getting injured at WR coached my beloved (and 0-2) Minnesota Vikings, Adrian Peterson would only get about five carries per game. Wouldn’t want to get him hurt, would you?
I’m Seth Stogsdill, and I’ve made my case. So what’s yours?








